New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Hotdubz
General
Posts: 9193
Registered for: 18 years 1 month
Car Make: VW
Car Model: Golf 7R
Membership No: missing
Location: Durban
Contact:

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Hotdubz »

NeoSA wrote:^ Durban "stock" :D
Nope, Audi stock. Seriously, nothing has been done to the car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ruan9n
Post Whore
Posts: 32020
Registered for: 16 years 8 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: Scirocco 2.0TSI dsg
Membership No: 1343
Location: PRETORIA

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by ruan9n »

On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
Candy white Scirocco 2.0TSI DSG StormtrooperXL 195kw 456nm @ stealth
Revo stage 2, Revo 76mm dp, Revo throttle pipe, APR 1&2 Carbonio intake, Neuspeed hiflow discharge pipe, H&R springs, 19" RS3 wheels, R8 coils, Iridiums, BSH dogbone insert, TTRS lca's, R interior.


Ex: Golf 6 GTI aka "pepper" 252hp 420nm
Ex: Golf 5 GTI aka "stormtrooper" 190kw 390nm
Ex: 9n Polo TDI sportline "The cupra polo" 125kw 430nm
Ex: Some other polos
Hoosier Daddy
Colonel
Posts: 5682
Registered for: 11 years 3 months
Car Make: Volkswagen
Car Model: Golf VI R
Membership No: 2023
Location: Durban

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Hoosier Daddy »

ruan9n wrote:On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
That's wkw as well :hurray:
My Dream: Gipsy Danger
My First Love: Lucy
Nikz_tsc wrote:Don't be an elachi bhai
Slowboat
Lieutenant
Posts: 1004
Registered for: 21 years 8 months
Location: Gauteng

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Slowboat »

Stu wrote:what does each gear change on a manual car cost on a 1/4m maybe 0.3-0.5 of a Sec of which most cars do around 3 changes
I wish it was 0.3-0.5sec on my car.
The G-Tech readings from my manual Golf 5 GTI with the GT2860RS turbo on at that time at Tarlton a few years back. Lost over 2 seconds of power in the three gear changes during the 1/4mile run.

Image
Image

Its not just how fast you can change gears, it is also how fast the power comes back after the gear change.
If you're behind, you're slow. If you're in front, you're in my way.

Image
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

ruan9n wrote:On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
Don't cars make a little more wkw down in DBN as opposed to up here in JHB? I know NA cars definitely do, but I believe even turbo'ed cars benefit from the lowered altitude. Good to know my car makes about 20wkw more than a stock 7 GTi :D
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
VW POLOTIC
Lieutenant
Posts: 1998
Registered for: 14 years 4 months
Membership No: missing
Location: Slaapstad

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by VW POLOTIC »

Hoosier Daddy wrote:
ruan9n wrote:On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
That's wkw as well :hurray:
And that's the whole point. VW claims FKW, which is always quite a bit more than WKW due to drive train losses. So receiving close to manufacturing claimed flywheel KW at your wheels, is quite an achievement.

I can't believe it took 4 pages on this toilit forim to summarize that! :crazy:

Just to add, my PGTI made 112wkw stock... so VW can be very conservative when claiming power.
______________________________________________________________________
Current Ride: 2016 CW Polo GTI (Manual :cool: )
Previous Ride: 2007 Flash Red Polo GTI
CPI, H&R, Powerflow Downpipe, Forge DV, ITG CAI

"The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

VW POLOTIC wrote:
Hoosier Daddy wrote:
ruan9n wrote:On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
That's wkw as well :hurray:
And that's the whole point. VW claims FKW, which is always quite a bit more than WKW due to drive train losses. So receiving close to manufacturing claimed flywheel KW at your wheels, is quite an achievement.

I can't believe it took 4 pages on this toilit forim to summarize that! :crazy:

Just to add, my PGTI made 112wkw stock... so VW can be very conservative when claiming power.

As conservative as VW can be, some dynos can be optimistic as well. :troll: This thread still has not discussed the original question, as to why some VWs that make less power than their rivals can still be faster on the 400m stretch and/or around a track. My answer remains that suspension and traction systems in VW's are superior than those found, in say, Astra OPCs.
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
Hoosier Daddy
Colonel
Posts: 5682
Registered for: 11 years 3 months
Car Make: Volkswagen
Car Model: Golf VI R
Membership No: 2023
Location: Durban

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Hoosier Daddy »

Ratio's are why we are faster, straight line that is.
XDS is why we are quick when things aren't straight anymore.

/thread
My Dream: Gipsy Danger
My First Love: Lucy
Nikz_tsc wrote:Don't be an elachi bhai
User avatar
SemiColon
I sparkle in the sunlight
Posts: 10456
Registered for: 14 years 1 month
Car Make: Volvo
Car Model: S40 T5
Membership No: 1641
Location: Pretoria

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by SemiColon »

NeoSA wrote:
VW POLOTIC wrote:
Hoosier Daddy wrote:
ruan9n wrote:On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
That's wkw as well :hurray:
And that's the whole point. VW claims FKW, which is always quite a bit more than WKW due to drive train losses. So receiving close to manufacturing claimed flywheel KW at your wheels, is quite an achievement.

I can't believe it took 4 pages on this toilit forim to summarize that! :crazy:

Just to add, my PGTI made 112wkw stock... so VW can be very conservative when claiming power.

As conservative as VW can be, some dynos can be optimistic as well. :troll: This thread still has not discussed the original question, as to why some VWs that make less power than their rivals can still be faster on the 400m stretch and/or around a track. My answer remains that suspension and traction systems in VW's are superior than those found, in say, Astra OPCs.
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
You are not listening.

132kw PGTI-168whp
166kw ST - 190whp
184kw ST - 195whp
162kw GTI7-227whp
205kw OPC- 243whp

Same Dyno, same day. Do you see the GTI7? do you? wait let me make it bold.
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

SemiColon wrote:
NeoSA wrote:
VW POLOTIC wrote:
Hoosier Daddy wrote: That's wkw as well :hurray:
And that's the whole point. VW claims FKW, which is always quite a bit more than WKW due to drive train losses. So receiving close to manufacturing claimed flywheel KW at your wheels, is quite an achievement.

I can't believe it took 4 pages on this toilit forim to summarize that! :crazy:

Just to add, my PGTI made 112wkw stock... so VW can be very conservative when claiming power.

As conservative as VW can be, some dynos can be optimistic as well. :troll: This thread still has not discussed the original question, as to why some VWs that make less power than their rivals can still be faster on the 400m stretch and/or around a track. My answer remains that suspension and traction systems in VW's are superior than those found, in say, Astra OPCs.
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
You are not listening.

132kw PGTI-168whp
166kw ST - 190whp
184kw ST - 195whp
162kw GTI7-227whp
205kw OPC- 243whp

Same Dyno, same day. Do you see the GTI7? do you? wait let me make it bold.
Okay, okay, I concede. Engineering has f'all to do with it. VW has the kakkest suspension systems in the World, but they completely misquote their kW figures and actually make more power than the sun. In fact, adding software on any VW actually lowers the power. :yawn:
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
User avatar
jippo
Lieutenant
Posts: 1985
Registered for: 10 years 11 months
Car Model: ST
Location: JHB

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by jippo »

NeoSA wrote:
VW POLOTIC wrote:
Hoosier Daddy wrote:
ruan9n wrote:On dubrun....on the stealth dyno, a stock mk7 GTI made 162kw spot on!
That's wkw as well :hurray:
And that's the whole point. VW claims FKW, which is always quite a bit more than WKW due to drive train losses. So receiving close to manufacturing claimed flywheel KW at your wheels, is quite an achievement.

I can't believe it took 4 pages on this toilit forim to summarize that! :crazy:

Just to add, my PGTI made 112wkw stock... so VW can be very conservative when claiming power.

As conservative as VW can be, some dynos can be optimistic as well. :troll: This thread still has not discussed the original question, as to why some VWs that make less power than their rivals can still be faster on the 400m stretch and/or around a track. My answer remains that suspension and traction systems in VW's are superior than those found, in say, Astra OPCs.
Because the VWs make more power at the wheels -AKA, they aren't actually less powerful. I think we got to that already
F30 320d
ex: Focus ST250
User avatar
MouseGTI
Lieutenant
Posts: 1943
Registered for: 11 years 6 months
Car Make: Audi
Car Model: B8 2.0Diseasel
Membership No: missing
Location: Cape Town

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by MouseGTI »

Butthurt?

sent with small tehbo
Ex:
White '07 Polo GTI 9n3 - Stock
Black '07 Polo GTI 9n3 - 113fkw 234nm stock -> 153kw 277nm chooned
Silver '07 Slowdi A4 B7 1.8t - w/ T3T4 powers

Current:
Green '16 Kawasaki Z300 - 28kw :crazy:
Blue '15 Yamaha MT-07 - 55kw :lol:
Blue '13 B8.5 A4 2.0TDI - 130kw :driving:
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

You guys keep going on about power differences on the Dyno as if that's the law. Please explain to me how a Lumina SS (2007 model) that makes a metric KAK-HUIS more power than my car on a dyno struggles to pass me on a quarter mile stretch?

The answer is traction and suspension, but feel free to overlook that.
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

MouseGTI wrote:Butthurt?

sent with small tehbo

Your contribution is humbling. Wow.
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
User avatar
MouseGTI
Lieutenant
Posts: 1943
Registered for: 11 years 6 months
Car Make: Audi
Car Model: B8 2.0Diseasel
Membership No: missing
Location: Cape Town

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by MouseGTI »

I do try

sent with small tehbo
Ex:
White '07 Polo GTI 9n3 - Stock
Black '07 Polo GTI 9n3 - 113fkw 234nm stock -> 153kw 277nm chooned
Silver '07 Slowdi A4 B7 1.8t - w/ T3T4 powers

Current:
Green '16 Kawasaki Z300 - 28kw :crazy:
Blue '15 Yamaha MT-07 - 55kw :lol:
Blue '13 B8.5 A4 2.0TDI - 130kw :driving:
User avatar
jippo
Lieutenant
Posts: 1985
Registered for: 10 years 11 months
Car Model: ST
Location: JHB

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by jippo »

NeoSA wrote:You guys keep going on about power differences on the Dyno as if that's the law. Please explain to me how a Lumina SS (2007 model) that makes a metric KAK-HUIS more power than my car on a dyno struggles to pass me on a quarter mile stretch?

The answer is traction and suspension, but feel free to overlook that.
Yes traction plays a big part. Nobody denies that. You're denying that power at the wheels matters.
Look at the exit speeds of the Lumina and you will see that after 400m it will tear past you.
F30 320d
ex: Focus ST250
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

I'm not denying that power at the wheels matter. What I am saying is that I've witnessed first hand that VAG cars seem to be able to put power down better than their competition. That's why, even when the competition does have more power at the wheels, you'd still see the VAG car come out front robot-to-robot or during daily driving due to superior systems that put the power down. It's my opinion that the added 2-5kW you see on the dyno is not the key to why VAG cars perform better.

Let me put it like this: take a focus ST and a Golf 6 GTi and set them up so that both make 180kW at the wheels and 350nm torque. I'm willing to bet over a 400m stretch, the Golf 6 is going to be in front.
Last edited by NeoSA on Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
User avatar
SemiColon
I sparkle in the sunlight
Posts: 10456
Registered for: 14 years 1 month
Car Make: Volvo
Car Model: S40 T5
Membership No: 1641
Location: Pretoria

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by SemiColon »

NeoSA wrote:You guys keep going on about power differences on the Dyno as if that's the law. Please explain to me how a Lumina SS (2007 model) that makes a metric KAK-HUIS more power than my car on a dyno struggles to pass me on a quarter mile stretch?

The answer is traction and suspension, but feel free to overlook that.
Weight, gearing, traction :thumbup:
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

This conversations is way too technical for a Monday, plus, I've just had a root canal. So let's say that VW's are faster because Race Car.
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
User avatar
SemiColon
I sparkle in the sunlight
Posts: 10456
Registered for: 14 years 1 month
Car Make: Volvo
Car Model: S40 T5
Membership No: 1641
Location: Pretoria

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by SemiColon »

NeoSA wrote:Let me put it like this: take a focus ST and a Golf 6 GTi and set them up so that both make 180kW at the wheels and 350nm torque. I'm willing to bet over a 400m stretch, the Golf 6 is going to be in front.

Why would you detune a GTI? :lol:
NeoSA
Cadet
Posts: 968
Registered for: 12 years 10 months
Membership No: missing

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by NeoSA »

SemiColon wrote:
NeoSA wrote:Let me put it like this: take a focus ST and a Golf 6 GTi and set them up so that both make 180kW at the wheels and 350nm torque. I'm willing to bet over a 400m stretch, the Golf 6 is going to be in front.

Why would you detune a GTI? :lol:
LMAO. well played. :hurray:
'11 MK6 GTi DSG - Unitronic 2+
User avatar
Tidy
Captain
Posts: 2402
Registered for: 14 years 5 months
Car Make: Suzuki
Car Model: Jimny
Membership No: missing
Location: Umhlanga, KZN
Contact:

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Tidy »

NeoSA wrote:
SemiColon wrote:
NeoSA wrote:Let me put it like this: take a focus ST and a Golf 6 GTi and set them up so that both make 180kW at the wheels and 350nm torque. I'm willing to bet over a 400m stretch, the Golf 6 is going to be in front.

Why would you detune a GTI? :lol:
LMAO. well played. :hurray:
both cars can make the exact same power but their torque/kw curve can be totally different??
Current:
Suzuki Grand Vitara (Pearl White) 1.5'' Lift, 17" Magnums, Pirelli Scorpion ATR's
Kawasaki Ninja ZX6R 636 (Custom Saturn Black)

Ex:
Suzuki Jimny (Pearl Black)
Peugeot 207 GTI (Diablo Red)
VW Polo 9n3 Sportline (Black Magic)
VW Polo 9n Classic 1.4 TDi (Silver Bird)
Mazda Astina 180SE 16v (Gunmetal)
User avatar
PoLonY
Gimme sausage. The thicker the better!
Posts: 18586
Registered for: 14 years 9 months
Car Make: Audi
Car Model: A8
Membership No: 1997
Location: Modderfontein

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by PoLonY »

Tidy wrote:
NeoSA wrote:
SemiColon wrote:
NeoSA wrote:Let me put it like this: take a focus ST and a Golf 6 GTi and set them up so that both make 180kW at the wheels and 350nm torque. I'm willing to bet over a 400m stretch, the Golf 6 is going to be in front.

Why would you detune a GTI? :lol:
LMAO. well played. :hurray:
both cars can make the exact same power but their torque/kw curve can be totally different??
too
many
variables
Zubair
Major-General
Posts: 7404
Registered for: 21 years 2 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: MK1
Membership No: missing
Location: Johannesburg

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Zubair »

My head hurts... Neo you over think things when almost everyone here has tried to explain the same thing to you repeatedly it still goes over your head?
Ex '02 Citi.Com 20VT K04
Ex '12 GTI 6 Candy White,Manual,Revo STG 2, 250whp 460nm KAR pump fuel only.

'80 MK1 L 2Dr 8V Throttles
'92 CTI 16VT 240whp @ Panic 0.3 bars boost.
'12 GTI 6 Candy White DSG 14.4 @ 160km/h Tarlton Stock Std.


Zubair Aka Boost Junkie

ZUB-AIR-RESEARCH
Boost Developments
Jueshen
Lieutenant
Posts: 1337
Registered for: 15 years 6 months
Location: GP

Re: New Focus ST vs GTI 7 perfomance

Post by Jueshen »

Slowboat wrote:
Stu wrote:what does each gear change on a manual car cost on a 1/4m maybe 0.3-0.5 of a Sec of which most cars do around 3 changes
I wish it was 0.3-0.5sec on my car.
The G-Tech readings from my manual Golf 5 GTI with the GT2860RS turbo on at that time at Tarlton a few years back. Lost over 2 seconds of power in the three gear changes during the 1/4mile run.

Image
Image

Its not just how fast you can change gears, it is also how fast the power comes back after the gear change.

think a wotbox will help u lots...
NLS and you always stay on boost...
Ex:
2007 Polo GTI
Eurodyne! 230WHP & 390NM @ KAR 2016 - without OB
2013 Honda Ballade Elegance
1996 Honda Ballade 150i
1994 Honda Ballade 150 Luxline
1991 Citi Golf 1.3
2009 Citi Rox 1.4i
2007 Polo 1.6 Comfortline
1989 Citi Sport 1.8
Post Reply